A Miserable Start to March for the Markets
Amid losses at AIG and Berkshire Hathaway, what Wall Street strategists and economists are saying about the markets and the good husbandry
Traders work steady the knock down of the New York Stock Exchange in New York City. Mario Tama/Getty Images
By BW staff
If stock market action on the first and foremost day of the month is some indication, March isn’t looking any better than February. A recent batch of bad news brutalized U.S. stock indexes on Mar. 2, with the Dow Jones industrial mean proportion falling in the regions of the dead 7,000 with a view to the at the outset time because that 1997. News of a massive loss at pupil of the state American International Group (AIG)—a record $61 billion in red ink in the fourth quarter—and setbacks for the time of the quarter despite investing icon Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA) put already rough investors in an even worse vein.
To offer an exclamation point adhering things, the Oracle of Omaha in his annual note to Berkshire shareholders said the thrift is in "meat market."
And while reports released Mar. 2 on exterior income and spending for January came in ahead of Street expectations, as did the Institute in favor of Supply Management’s February public recital on the freedom from disease of the manufacturing sector, the advice wasn’t enough to put a dent in the bearish sentiment.
What are Wall Street strategists and economists statement about the current market and economic situation? Here, BusinessWeek presents a selection of comments published Mar. 2:
Phil Roth, Miller Tabak
The DJIA and the S&P 500 closed at unused lows for the cycle [on Feb. 27], but there were a number of positive divergences. The Nasdaq Composite and the Russell 2000 did not break their fourth-quarter 2008 lows, nor did the continually increasing advance/decline lines for the S&P 500 public funds and for the NYSE operating companies. However, all those measures are close to their lows, likewise the only way to convert those divergences to important bullish signals is for a strong rally perpendicular away. A few bad days, without interjacent strength, will likely result in liberal confirmations on the downside. Similarly, momentum indicators, including measures of price, generosity, and volume momentum, have not reached the negative extremes recorded in October-November 2008, only the same caveat applies.
In any case, even if an exploitable ship is made around current levels, months pleasure be needed to establish a base for a broad, sustained recovery. At by most propriety, we believe 2009 can be a transition year even if the lows are in.
Sam Stovall, Standard & Poor’s
All 15 uphold markets considering 1929 declined a median 34%, over 18 months. They retraced 60% of the prior bull emporium’session advance and took 17 months for the S&P 500 to get back to break-even. For mega-meltdowns, or declines in undue amount of 40%, the numbers were more severe: They declined an average 51%, retraced more than 100% of the prior bull market, and lasted longer than two years. The worst decline occurred in the Great Crash from 1929-32, when the S&P 500 pitiless 86%. The longest undergo lasted 42 months, from 1938 to 1942, while the greatest give-back occurred during the 1937-38 bear, in which the S&P 500 retraced nearly 120% of what it gained in the 1935-37 bull. Therefore, when this bear emporium is finally over, nothing says it couldn’t have experienced the worst of all levels.
Richard Dickson, Paul Desmond, Lowry’s Reports
If equities were not low enough on Nov. 20 or on Feb. 23 to entice aggressive buying, therefore even lower prices are likely before the start of a sustained place of traffic advance. As long for example the current patterns of increasing supply and weakening demand persist, investors should take advantage of periods of rally to sell into stay and connect to defensive positions.
Michael Englund, Action Economics
Today’s U.S. economic reports revealed upside surprises to January income and spending that suggest a less dire outlook for the consumer [in the first quarter], though this "lost weakness" appeared later this morning in the January construction spending report. It now appears that construction activity will advertise its ugliest quarter of the down-cycle in Q1 by a considerable limit, and we now draw massive 23% rates of decline for nonresidential fixed investment in both Q4 and Q1 that leave businesses leading the charge appear gloomy for the economy as we entered 2009. Today’s ISM [manufacturing] report was a tad stronger than expected, but the employment component set a new all-time low (as did the import component), leaving a cheerless outlook for Friday’s jobs report. As it stands, we now expect fourth-quarter GDP to be revised to -6.5% from -6.2%, with a 5.0% avoid still likely in favor of the first locality.
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services
Through a combination of actions, AIG will reduce its obligations under the current $60 billion lending facility from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY). We expect that this will provide the company with the flexibility to be steadfast its asset-disposition lay out at a more measured pace.
Although in our view the actions of the U.S. government have largely eliminated the risks of further rapid degeneracy in the company’s creditworthiness, intermediate-term concerns about the company’s ability to retain key bat and market remunerative new business remain. AIG expects that the planned sale of the life operations, which we believe likely, order be necessary longer than originally planned, in some degree because of the lack of liquidness in the capital markets. As a result of these medium-term risks, the outlook is negative…[which reflects] our view that increased pressure put on the performance of AIG’s insurance businesses is suitable. We believe AIG is particularly susceptible to these broader market trends given its somewhat weakened predication. Although at this point we be the subject of not seen clear evidence of long-term damage to AIG’s franchise, there have been widespread reports that competitors are actively pursuing AIG’s accounts and key underwriting personnel.
Original text: http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/mar2009/pi2009032_938312.htm?campaign_id=rss_null
