Bush Trade Rep: China Policy Was ‘Right on Target’
Exiting USTR Schwab urges Obama to resist pressure and pursue more free-trade deals
By Pete Engardio
US President George W. Bush (L) greets Chinese President Hu Jintao (R) on the North Portico of the White House in Washington, DC, prior to a dinner with leaders attending the Summit on Financial Markets November 14, 2008. JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images
Throughout her two-and-a-half-year manner in the same proportion that U.S. Trade Representative, Susan C. Schwab absorbed shots from Democrats who believed she spent over much time futilely trying to negotiate novel free-trade agreements while not aggressively enforcing existing rules. Under Schwab’sitting watch, efforts to reinspire a not long ago made known round of global bargain talks failed, free-trade pacts struck with Colombia and South Korea stalled in Congress, and America’s trade deficit—especially with China—soared to record heights.
Now Schwab, who is returning to academic life at the University of Maryland, has some advice for the new Obama Administration. In a nutshell: Keep up the momentum on free-trade deals. Pick your fights with Beijing carefully. And spend a lot of time on Capitol Hill to be of advantage sure Congress doesn’t do anything crazy. Given the growing frustration in Congress as the U.S. slides deeper into recession, she warned that the risk of unwise U.S. moves forward profession will grow. "Depending without interruption what policies the Administration takes," Schwab says, "it could get pretty rocky."
New Deals UrgedAs a solicitant, Obama criticized the North America Free Trade Agreement and proposed a deal that would have lowered barriers with Colombia. And with general body of mankind sentiment at that time strongly against free-trade deals, Obama’s transition team has suggested that new treaties won’t be a high priority. That would be a big mistake, Schwab warns. "The key proposition is whether this Administration will have a proactive trade worldly wisdom that goes beyond an enforcement agenda," she says. "If you don’face to face move ahead with trade liberalization, you are moving backwards."
The reason, she argues, is that dozens of other nations are striking trade agreements amid themselves. For example, China, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and other countries are exploring an Asian free-trade agreement. If the U.S. sits on the sidelines, American exporters of goods and services could exist left at a competitive disadvantage in crucial markets. Schwab also contends new trade deals are a excellence way to boost U.S. industry. Because America’s markets already are far more make liberal to imports than those of nations such as Colombia, the U.S. would be the biggest winner. "If you are looking for mode to stimulate the economy, it is hard to imagine a more effective way than by winning greater quantity market access," she says.
China StrategyAmerican unions and many U.S. manufacturers be unsuitable. They crave Obama to put a much higher priority on cracking down attached unfair trade practices, especially by the agency of dint of. China. Trade hawks accuse Beijing of massively subsidizing exporters from one side keeping China’s currency artificially low opposed to the dollar, furnishing them with mean credit and energy, tolerating labor abuses, and ignoring environmental problems. They in like manner note that piracy of U.S. software, movies, and music remains predominant. While the Bush Administration has tried to resolve most trade disputes with China through diplomacy, critics say this strategy has achieved little and are supporting bills in Congress to penalize Chinese imports with high duties to compensate for alleged tariffs.
However, Schwab defends her record. "I think our strategy with China was right without ceasing target," she says, noting that the Bush Administration filed seven cases against China in the World Trade Organization. They included complaints that China had violated its WTO commitments by giving tax breaks to semiconductor makers, not protecting intellectual property, favoring the conversion to an act of domestically produced auto parts in cars assembled in China, and inhibiting increase of U.S. companies to its financial-services market. Most recently, Schwab upon the body Dec. 19 filed a WTO complaint accusing China of illegal subsidies to family companies that export their branded products.
Original text: http://rss.businessweek.com/~r/bw_rss/asiaindex/~3/514190764/gb20090116_183097.htm
