Funds of funds were supposed to be the safe choice for wealthy investors and big institutions. But they were leveraged beyond the max

By David Henry and Matthew Goldstein

Watch original video:

John Hersey

Hedge funds, already suffering from an ill-fated tenderness affair with leverage, are verdict themselves haunted by some other riddle. It turns gone out many so-called funds of hedge funds, portfolios through stakes in multiple hedge funds, also depended on borrowed money. Now, with lenders retracting credit, fund-of-funds managers are being forced to dump assets, putting further pressure on the hedge funds and the markets generally. It’s “a vicious ring,” says Kate Hollis, director of fund research at Standard & Poor’s (MHP).

As the great edifice of leverage crumbles, funds of funds are faring worse than hedge funds. They’re off 18.7% this year, vs. 15.5% for individual hedge funds. Among the funds of funds hit hard: some run by Fix Asset Management, Ontario Partners, and HRJ Capital, co-founded by dint of. former football star Ronnie Lott. All declined to comment for this romance.

Funds of funds were supposed to be the safer choice for high-net-worth individuals and big institutions. By spreading their bets across dozens of investments, managers assured clients they didn’t possess to worry about a blowup in any single portfolio. It was the sort of flawed diversification argument used to justify many speculative investments during the resound, including those notorious collateralized debt obligations stuffed by subprime mortgage securities. The pitch fueled explosive growth: By the extremity of 2007, funds of funds accounted instead of 43%, or $747 billion, of the hedge fund industry, up from 19%, or $103 billion, in 2001, according to Hedge Fund Research.

OVERLOADED

Roughly half of that world employed purchase. Some funds of funds borrowed directly from banks to pervert with money $2 of assets for every $1 of investors’ coin. Brokers, meanwhile, encouraged affluent customers to finance their fund-of-funds purchases on reliance. Big banks sold “first in importance protection products,” derivatives that supposedly guaranteed clients wouldn’t lose a cent of their initial investment—and the banks in effect used leverage to create those insurance policies.

The funds of funds were layering purchase immediately after purchase. They owned hedge funds already loaded up with offence, roughly $6 on this account that each $1 of capital. When credit seized up, the process began to reverse. “Once things institute to delever, everything contracts,” says Andrea S. Kramer, a lawyer at McDermott Will & Emery who represents hedge funds.

To foster themselves, in the same state big global banks as France’s BNP Paribas, KBC Group of Belgium, and the Royal Bank of Canada are now charging higher fees on loans they extended to funds of funds, or pulling the loans entirely. The tight credit is compelling fund-of-funds managers to sell their holdings, that is driving individual funds to dump stocks, bonds, and commodities.

The situation shows none sign of stabilizing. Consider CMA Global Hedge PCC, a $360 million resources of funds. The portfolio, which over the years used financing from JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Société Gébornérale, and HSBC (HBC), is currently relying on credit from Citigroup (C) . Its holdings—47 hedge funds—are down 11%. Add in leverage, which amplifies losses, and CMA Global is not upon 25%.

Wary of Citi charging more for the fund’s lend, conductor Sabby Mionis is trying to sell hedge fund stakes to reduce debt. But a number of the funds have suspended redemptions, making it tough. Mionis is now working on a plan to return some money to investors: “For the foreseeable futurity, leveraged funds of funds are dead.”

Original text: {news-link}