Utility Stocks: Should You Plug In?
S&P has a neutral outlook on the subindustry, but likes a calculate of funds in the group, including strong-buy-ranked Sempra Energy
By Sam Stovall From Standard & Poor’s Equity Research
The Standard & Poor’sitting 1500 Multi-Utilities subindustry index is a recent joining to the High Momentum List (see in the world of sense). Its trailing 12-month price performance is in the zenith 10% of all subindustries in the S&P Composite 1500 index (consisting of the S&P 500, MidCap 400, and SmallCap 600 indexes). Like most companies and subindustries in the equity market, this subindustry index has declined, falling 29.9% year to date through Oct. 24, 2008, vs. the 40.2% slump for the S&P 1500. Granted, it would be preferable to find a group that is posting positive results simultaneously with relative outperformance.
Take a look at the accompanying chart. As a reminder, the jagged cerulean line represents the subindustry index’s rolling 52-week price performance as compared with the 52-week performance as being the S&P 1500. Any point atop of 100 indicates market outperformance over the prior year, while points below 100 indicate mart underperformance. The red line is a rolling 39-week moving average, while the two green bands mark one standard deviation on high and below the index’s long-term mean relative nerve.
There are 25 large-, mid- and small-cap companies in the S&P 1500 Multi-Utilities subindustry index, seven of which convey S&P investing. rankings of 4 STARS (purchase) or 5 STARS (strong buy). Alliant Energy (LNT), Ameren (AEE), Dominion Resources (D), MDU Resources Group (MDU), Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG), and Xcel Energy (XEL) are reaped ground ranked 4 STARS, while Sempra Energy (SRE) carries a 5 STARS recommendation.
Customers May DefaultChristopher Muir, the algebraist who follows this subindustry for S&P Equity Research, has a neutral fundamental outlook for the multi-utilities group for the next 12 months. He expects that regulated utility operations will be permanent to examine single-digit percentage revenue growth in 2008. Higher and more inconstant article of merchandise prices have raised the cost of fuel and purchased host for electric utilities and supply costs for gas utilities.
While utilities are allowed to pass these increases on to customers over time, Muir believes there are some potential negative goods. Faced with higher bills, customers may default upon the body some payments. Also, for example a result of higher customer bills, S&P thinks regulators are going to more thoroughly scrutinize large utility rate increase requests. Usage per customer is likely to stagnate in response to continued high power and gas prices. Muir expects growth in the number of customers served to partly offset more of these factors.
Regarding utilities with unregulated operations in the same state as oil and gas research and production (E&P), Muir notes that while gas prices are currently lower than their 2005 highs (and 2008’s earlier highs), oil prices reached record levels in mid-2008. After peaking in early July, prices fell through the end of the summer and into the fall.
Supply Bottlenecks PossibleS&P furthermore sees higher hibernate peak commodity price cheerfulness due to serve instead of bottlenecks. Given the potential for gyrating prices, Muir believes multi-utilities with trading operations should produce higher earnings. Multi-utilities that participate in based on competition wholesale and retail power markets should be useful to from relatively sturdy power prices, in S&P’s view.
Some companies are threatening business risk by reducing exposure to mercantile and oil and elastic fluid exploration and product operations, while planning to use the proceeds to make large-scale share repurchases and debt reductions.
In joining to growth in unregulated businesses, S&P believes investors have been attracted to dividend yields greater than those of most other subindustries in the S&P 1500. S&P thinks the dividends paid by means of these companies should have appeal for investors in not burdensome of increased concerns about the rate of real gross household product growth. So there you have it. The group’s strong relative strength, but negative unconditional performance, is confirmed by a neutral fundamental outlook, in S&P’s view.
Original text: {news-link}
