World Business

Watch original video:

Infosys reported earnings today and provided yet another writing of solid ground of belief that the sky is not falling for the Indian outsourcing industry. It beat expectations by a 30 percent rise in quarterly profit. It moreover divide its forecast slightly for full-year dollar revenue growth for the cause that of currency value shifts. That move, of succession, prompted investors to dump the stock in droves. But it’s important to indicate by a mark between the performance of these companies and the behavior of investors.

The signal I got today from talking to Infosys CEO Kris Gopalakrishnan was cautious optimism. “Demand is truly good. We’re not seeing any slowdown,” he told me. The global financial meltdown and looming recession in the US have made him wary. But he still thinks Infosys and other top Indian tech services firms will fair reasonably well in the downturn. Companies look for ways to cut costs during a recession, and, in spite of wage inflation amidst the Indian services outfits, be in action done in that place still carries a price advantage. In fact, the 8.4 percent drop in value of the rupee against the dollar last deal out means Indian labor is become MORE competitive, not less.

There are other pieces of evidence of solidity in the Indian tech services business. Cognizant reaffirmed its profits. guidance for the year today. IBM, that employs greater quantity than 80,000 tribe in India, reaffirmed its guidance yestersday. And another furniture: TCS on Tuesday agreed to pay $505 million for Citigroup’s BPO operations in India.

So far, so good.

Original text: {news-link}

Unearthing the overall credit profile of the U.S. equity market

From Standard & Poor’s Equity Research

Watch original video:

This matters since the U.S. plan, once again, is sending signals that recession may be inevitable. The August employment report showed the eighth-consecutive monthly decline in nonfarm payrolls, as the U.S. unemployment cost spiked to 6.1% from 5.7% in July. The August rendering of the Institute for Supply Management’s Purchasing Managers’ Index was much more ambiguous than the August employment report when it comes to U.S. economic weakness. The August ISM PMI fell to the end of time so slightly to a very taking no part with either side 49.9 from a perfectly neutral reading of 50 in July. The yet to be management of the ISM PMI is relevant to the pair the U.S. economy and underlying corporate credit conditions.

Standard & Poor’s Market, Credit and Risk Strategies’ mete was to provide a comparative framing for judging the risk/return profile on account of each of the 10 sectors of the S&P 1500 equity index over the last eight years where ratings data is available.

On medium, there is a fairly consistent trend since 2000 for equities of moderate-risk A, BBB, and BB-rated companies to outperform either their higher investment-grade AAA-rated peers or their decrease, speculative-grade B peers. Alpha-seeking equity investors have recently shown a precedence for BBB and BB-rated companies for the period of the post-2002 emporium period, that could prove to have existence problematic if the economy slips into prolonged recession.

Given the damage a sustained U.S. downturn would inflict on corporate profits and the in posse for increased incorporated defaults, investors at a minimum may want to monitor the overall credit-risk side face of their portfolios according to sector weightings as a starting point for investigating credit sort at the individual constituent level. Investors could theoretically achieve a more defensive sector-neutral equity posture by reallocating within any given sector from a neckcloth through some associated BB issuer rating to a stock with a higher A issuer rating. Investors could also make the opposite decision once they conclude that the U.S. household outlook is brightening.

We began by summarizing the average credit-rating endanger profile, sector by sector, for the 844 corporations within the S&P 1500 for which Standard & Poor’sitting has assigned long-term issuer credit ratings since January 2000. We structured our query to return data on companies with credit ratings falling between AAA and B, choosing to exclude the C-rated companies due to the small sample sizes and be in want of consistent history returned among the 10 sectors.

The majority of the 10 sectors in the S&P 1500 equity index, where the constituents also have affiliated Standard & Poor’s long-term issuer credit ratings, tend to be delivered of credit ratings falling somewhere between A and BB since 2000.

Credit ratings instead of consumer staples, financials, telecom, and utilities leaned toward the investment-grade categories of A and BBB, while consumer discretionary, energy, health care, industrials, materials, and information technology were weighted toward BBB and BB (i.e., both investment grade and speculative grade).

It is also interesting how “external factors” can accept a transient effect on market-perceived credit risks respecting to the long-standing ratings actions of credit analysts. For example, according to the profiles shown in a high place, spiritedness stocks have presented a relatively riskier regard outline, that with hindsight was in all probability somewhat overstated when gauged to match the escalating price of crude oil and natural gas. On the other craftsman, the financials sector historically has been assigned a solid snare investment-grade credit rating. But the reality of sharp declines in real estate valuations and rising mortgage delinquencies have dramatically altered market perceptions round the credit risks surrounding this sector.

The bull market in commodities has also been a supportive “external factor” for the materials sector, while the credit crunch has weighed heavily on the auto, retail, and homebuilding industries within the consumer discretionary sector. The second chart delineates the average balance within the S&P 1500 between investment-grade and speculative-grade companies since 2000 for the 10 sectors of the S&P 1500 where confidence ratings data are use.

Multiple variables of unknown sway pertaining to the relationship between equity power quality and performance reach to mind after reviewing this report. First of all, the fact that shares of AAA and AA-rated companies underperformed those of lesser credit-quality companies, such as BBB and BB, is at least partially due, we ponder, to the reality that higher-quality, large-cap funds, be pleased with the ones included in the S&P 500 index, were driven to egregious P/E multiples at the height of the “bubble” in the year 2000, the year in which our premises in this study begin. Therefore, we think part of the mind for the AAA/AA large-cap underperformance was that these funds had a much further distance from which to fall after the bubble burst.

Likewise, the outperformance over the extreme five-plus years of small-cap and mid-cap stocks during the excessively easy credit terms that existed until mid-year 2007 also helps explain wherefore shares of lesser quality BBB and BB issuer-rated companies consider done in this way well relative to comparatively higher-grade credits.

This brings us to the current day and the past year’s course from increasing subprime mortgage delinquencies, to financial sector credit crunch, to full-blown global credence contagion, a series of events that prompted mart participants to rethink past assumptions not far from credit quality and credit risk.

This makes us believe that investors may now not to be present to scrutinize the underlying constituent regard ratings within and between equity sectors which time making strategic portfolio allocation decisions.

Original text: {news-link}

Given Google’s share of exploration and research ads and its efforts to broaden services, analysts find the skidding stock mighty attractive

Watch original video:

Google (GOOG)—52-week dunce price

by Gene Marcial

Never say never, especially in this character of a brutal market environment. Who would have expected that Google (GOOG), the world’s largest and most powerful Internet company, would ever feel its stock tumble to (gasp) 328 a share. Yes, 328. And in this kind of irresolute, volatile market, the stock may even skid some more.

Who would have expected that Google will be selling at that which more people maxim are fire-sale prices? In April, Google traded at 555.

Remember that Google traded as pre-eminent as 747.24 steady Nov. 7, 2007. Few meditation it would give back a significant chunk of its astonishing gains as it became a public company in August 2004. Well, on Oct. 9, 2008, it did, mirroring the jaw-dropping sell-off in the broader market.

So what should investors do now with the stock of the Internet King?

Investors take been yearning to buy into Google at prices lower than 500. At its current cost, Google is trading at a depressed (for Google, anyway) price-earnings ratio of 14.9, based adhering Zacks Investment Research’s estimated 2009 earnings of $21.03 per share, down from its p-e ratio of 34.6 at the end of 2007. So the undervalued and oversold condition of Google seems clear.

One algebraist who sees the enticement of Google at its tide estimation is Mark May, an analyst at investment firm Needham & Co. (it has done banking for the sake of Google), who issued a buy rating adhering Oct. 1, when the fast-moving stock was trading at 405.

"We convinced the current valuation at 15 times [based on his 2009 earnings foresee of $22.74 a share] is highly compelling," wrote May in a annotation to clients. For 2008, his earnings estimate is $19.63 a allotment, up from 2007’s $15.58. He is maintaining his pervert with money recommendation, with a 12-month price target of 690 a share. May says any risk of possible disappointments in Google’s third-quarter revenues are already largely anticipated and reflected in the stock’s current price.

"Google remains the dominant market-share company in both the U.S. and globally," says May. Current traffic data indicates that seek volumes at Google "continue to exist solid," he adds. Google provides Web search and online advertising services on the Internet.

The weakened established order is undoubtedly having an impact on Google’s results, and a stronger dollar could stroke its revenues, says May. Some analysts have revised downward their estimates to adjust to the dollar’s recent strengthening. But May argues that continued gains in Google’sitting search business and the resilience of the set’s performance-based marketing channels are helping scion those concerns. And Google has one of the beyond all others platforms, he points out, for expansion into new high-growth consumer and advertising service markets.

Jason Avilio, an analyst at investment firm Kaufman Bros., says he still likes the lay up because Google continues to take market share in search advertising from just about everyone else. "Despite its competitors’ best efforts, Google’sitting mart share continues to grow, and we don’t look for this to quiet anytime soon," says Avilio, who rates the stock a buy.

No doubt the global economic uncertainty and competitive pressures could slow the troop’s revenue product. But Scott Kessler, an analyst at Standard & Poor’s, isn’confidentially too worried, and rates the stock a pervert with money furthermore. Google’s business model, he argues, has demonstrated "notable resiliency," and he favors the company’s efforts to broaden its services, especially in Web applications and mobile services.

Independent research outfit ValuEngine rates Google outperform, based put on data and information it has gathered, and puts its esteem at 618.37 a share.

Without a doubt, the selling in Google shares appears to be overdone. Street analysts think so. Of the 34 who follow Google, all except undivided recommends buying the stock as of Oct. 8, according to Bloomberg. The one dissident rates Google a hold.

At Google’session currently depressed price, investors need not search far and remote for a truly beaten-down stock that is as underpriced as this Internet behemoth.

Unless otherwise noted, neither the sources cited in Gene Marcial’sitting Stock Picks nor their firms hold positions in the stocks under discussion. Similarly, they have not one investment banking or other financial relationships with them.

Original text: {news-link}

During the closely three-week ban on shorting financial shares, the market sank 21.5%. Are regulators in the pattern of the wrong parties?

by David Bogoslaw

Watch original video:

As the panicked selling in equities markets around the world has accelerated over the past two weeks, there have been several attempts to slow the process, including the transitory suspension of mercantile on stock exchanges from Moscow to Milan. In the U.S., the Securities & Exchange Commission banned short-selling—bets that shares of certain companies would fall—forward a list of more than 800 financial stocks whose balance sheets have exposing. to risky mortgage-backed securities and other distressed products.

When the ban, which lasted 13 commercial days, was lifted on Oct. 9, it signaled a return to profession to the degree that usual for the financial sector. Shares of Morgan Stanley (MS), one of the last-standing investment banks, which recently became a bank holding company subject to tighter government regulation, sold off with a vengeance, finishing almost 26% lower on Oct. 9 and dropping an additional 24% on Oct. 10. Insurance stocks such as Prudential Financial (PRU) and Hartford Financial Services Group (HIG) were also among the biggest losers on Oct. 9.

Whether the ban had the intended purport remains open to debate, given the 21.5% drop in the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index from the market close on Sept. 19, before the prohibitory penalty took effect, through its hindmost day, Oct. 8. And the nearly 33% pitch during the same period in the KBW Bank Index (BKX), which has a a great quantity closer correlation with the 800 names traders were prohibited from shorting, is enough to pass over one think regulators were trying to shut up blame for the extended sell-off in pecuniary stocks on the wrong people.

Some market strategists think the ban was nothing if it were not that political cover for the SEC to show it was paying attention. In substantialness, the regulator has been behind the curve in reining in dubious financial reporting practices through the major financial institutions, which helped create the current crisis. By preventing short-selling as antidote to two and a half weeks, the SEC disrupted "a legitimate way for investors to convey intelligence to the market" near the pricing of stocks, says Gerald Buetow, managing director of Portfolio Management Consultants, the investment arm of Envestnet . If anything, the ban on selling short seems to be in actual possession of exacerbated emporium volatility by the agency of depressing trades in the options market and forcing investors who couldn’t hedge their long principal positions to take offsetting options to sell their public securities.

The market-makers who afford much of the liquidity in the options place of traffic curtailed their selling of options on financial stocks during the ban because they couldn’familiarily fold up themselves by the agency of selling short, says Peter Bottini, charged with execution vice-president in quest of trading at optionsXpress (OXPS) in Chicago. He thought they would jump rightful outer part in after the outlaw ended, but that hasn’t occurred. That’s with appearance of truth because the key liquidity providers tend to be the options desks at the larger banks, whose shortage of cash isn’t allowing them to play that role right now. That’s common driver, he believes, of the unprecedented airiness in the equities market at the end of this week. The Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index (VIX) soared 20%, to a record-high 76.94 on Oct. 10 before sliding in a backward direction. \ to close just under 70.

For those who are determined to impel down the price of a stock, there are far more effective and smaller quantity costly ways to do so than by selling short, says Buetow at Portfolio Management Consultants.

Original text: {news-link}

Major U.S. hand futures pointed to a higher open Monday after central banks and governments around the world announced massive liquidity measures

Watch original video:

U.S. stocks were indicated to expand sharply higher as greater hand futures surged in premarket trading subsequently the Federal Reserve and other global central banks move to inject huge amounts of cash into their banking systems. The moves followed meetings by the G7 and governments over the weekend.

Treasury futures were skidding, indicating uniting yields were rebellion in reaction to the central bank movements that appear to have relieved panic that prevailed utmost week. U.S. banks and government closed Monday for the Columbus Day observance.

The index was dollar sink. Gold and oil futures are higher on short covering, hopes banking efforts revive global economies and boost interrogation for commodities.

European indexes were soaring subsequent the Asian market surged overnight.

The bond market is closed Monday in observance of the U.S. Columbus Day holiday.

After meetings of the G-7 and International Monetary Fund in Washington this out of the reach of weekend, Western financial leaders sought to assure panicky bankers and money managers in none uncertain terms that every one of of the measures needed to halt a worldwide meltdown are in motion.

While short on the details many market analysts had hoped for, the broad brushstrokes of forceful, coordinated action by Western governments were unveiled: No more Lehman Brothers-like failures of major financial institutions will be allowed. All bank deposits will be guaranteed. The banking systems of the G-7 nations will be flooded with almost unlimited liquidity. And if every one of that fails, any other tool—regardless of how economically heterodox—will subsist used if needed.

Also, five central banks — including the U.S. Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank — unveiled new measures to thaw frozen credit markets and bolster funding to banks. They joined the Bank of England, the European Central Bank and the Swiss National Bank in saying they would furnish supplies absolute U.S. dollar funds to fiscal institutions. The Bank of Japan said it was considering similar measures.

According to a Wall Street Journal report, the Fed be inclined commence providing indefinite dollar funding under its swap facilities by three major European central banks to ease strains in the financial markets. The European Central Bank, the Bank of England and the Swiss National Bank said in a joint statement that the terms of their respective currency swap arrangements through the Fed have been altered “to make comfortable whatever quantity of U.S. dollar funding is demanded.”

In Paris, European leaders agreed to a unified plan that would throw in billions of euros into their banks and assurance bank debt for periods up to five years. President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, who led the talks, said governments would announce concrete rescue plans tailored to their national circumstances today simultaneously, the NYT reported. Leaders of the 15 countries that use the euro did not put a price tag on any of their promises — contrary to Britain, where remain week Prime Minister Gordon Brown announced $255 billion in government funds and other measures to stabilize its banks, or the United States, in which place a $700 billion bailout plan command now be used in part to infuse banks by fresh capital.

The salvation measures in Europe echo those announced last week by the British government, which confirmed Monday that it is injecting a gross amount of 37 billion pounds (US$63 billion) into three leading banks — Royal Bank of Scotland PLC (RY), Lloyds TSB PLC (LYG) and HBOS PLC — in return for equity stakes. Taxpayers will own about 60% of RBS and 40 percent of the merged Lloyds TSB and HBOS. The merger has been renegotiated Monday too, so the amount of Lloyds TSB shares that HBOS shareholders will receive is lower.

U.S.

Original text: {news-link}

Don’t be surprised to see a new wave of combination as stronger players snap up weaker ones

by Ben Steverman

Watch original video:

Eventually, the acme desire end. That has investors contemplating what a post-crisis stock place of traffic might be turned like.

Predictions of a in earnest economic downturn are from china to peru, and not just for the U.S. nevertheless as being the entire globe. If the credit crunch lasts long enough, it could bring forth existence the earliest truly deep economic pullback in a offspring or longer.

Asked about the future, many professional investors and fund managers say they’re far too preoccupied with the current crisis to act any long-term bets. That’s why they many refuse to buy stocks—the unprecedented global credit crunch has made real predictions all but impossible.

"I’m going to wait until the dust settles," says William Rutherford, president of Rutherford Investment Management.

Still, investors will eventually have to drawing what the new economic order will look like.

Arguably, a credit crunch or recession makes altogether of us losers. But even in a severe recession, some businesses survive and prosper—even if only on a relative foundation, and fair if they swallow years to muddle through.

"There’s always going to be a winner out there," says Ryan Crane, chief investment officer at Stephens Investment Management Group.

Here are five trends that may emerge at whatever time the crisis finally ends:

1. The strong eat the weak.

In the pecuniary sector, failing banks and brokerage houses have already been gobbled up by dint of. safer (granting that not exactly strong) rivals. Bank of America (BAC) bought up mortgage giant Countrywide Financial and Merrill Lynch (MER). JPMorgan Chase (JPM) absorbed Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual. Citigroup (C) and Wells Fargo (WFC) embattled over buying Wachovia (WB).

If the economic downturn is bad enough, expect the like trend to hit other industries, as strong players one and the other buy or take market share from companies in financial trouble.

2. Fast-growing companies might not get the funding they need.

The give faith to crunch is wounding off the financing that helps businesses grow and create new jobs, says Michele Gambera, chief economist at Ibbotson Associates, a one of Morningstar (MORN). Companies can’t float issues upon the stock market or sell bonds—investors won’t buy them. And they can’t borrow from banks, what one. are too panicked to afford.

If those conditions persist, it means trouble by respect to new produce companies. "Who is going to make the next Google (GOOG) if there is no money to borrow to build the next Google campus?" Gambera asks.

Original text: {news-link}

I made it through the notorious first two weeks of class known as Camp Omni, the in-residence period of the MBA-E program

by Linda Craib

Watch original video:

If the days, weeks, and months leading up to starting classes at Yale were defined by a sense of contemplation, then the past month of my lifetime can only be described as one of pure joyousness as a member of the Class of 2010. Having spent my entire life aspiring to this level of academia, all I can think about since arriving is savoring each constituent.

I made it through the notorious pristine two weeks of class known considered in the state of Camp Omni, the in-residence phrase of the MBA-E program. Living at the Omni Hotel in New Haven by my unaccustomed classmates, I faced a semester’s worth of microeconomics, financial accounting, and pecuniary reporting crammed into a two-week period. It was made clear to our class upon the first day that the virtue of the Yale measure was pre-eminent. We would be completing altogether the requirements of the full-time MBA under the same academic standards otherwise than that in a compressed time frame. For anyone contemplating of the like kind an MBA, the time commitment and demands are legendary.

Soon after arriving on campus for the two-week summer bootcamp, our class was separate into teams of four or five students. Yale did a bulky do job-work of creating teams that took our relative strengths, weaknesses, and personalities into consideration. First we spent an orientation weekend getting to apprehend each other through various team-building events. We were given a formal welcome at the Union League Café by a great dinner, good wine, the company of our boot camp professors, new friends, and “Handsome Dan” bulldog chocolates wrapped through a Yale blue bow. Everyone was fervid, relaxed, and excited to begin.

At 9 a.m. Monday morning in late July, the bootcamp’s classes officially commenced and the small talk was excessively. We started and we simply didn’t assume to stop. The experience was nonentity terse of a free-fall from my "known"world of health care, straight down the rabbit hole into the unknown world of concern management. Undergoing immersion at its best, I faced culture blow navigating a world with its own relationship to time (not one) and its be in possession of language. This was a curious place that ran parallel to a hall of mirrors. Sunk costs in no degree influenced a time to come course of action, debits and credits were left and right, minding the "GAAP" had nothing to do with the London underground, and "senior debt" took without interruption a strange meaning all cheek by jowl.

Every day and night during those initial pair weeks included six hours of chide, lunch-and-learn sessions, evening Excel tutorials, extensive readings, feeble group act, and individual assignments. Somehow during week two, we managed to squeeze in attending a dinner with a biotechnology array moderated by means of a CNBC news correspondent—an evening that supposing a thought-provoking exchange of ideas and new perspectives on health care costs and profits for someone with my clinical background. Day after day new ideas were broached and slowly the pieces began to make some sense. I was tired and sleep became a coveted commodity. The fledgling economist in me trusted that my choices were inherently rational when I was budgeting time to sleep and time to study; the experience of assigning value to both helped me better know the concepts of utility, pleasure, and indifference curves.

Those highest two weeks at Yale may have been grueling, but there were jewels hidden in the workload. Friendships that began the first short weekend were solid within days and have only grown stronger. I have the benefit of a remarkable group of individuals to learn with and learn from; I admire every one of them. Members of my class are as likely to clutch the title of executive of a health care startup as physician, finance manger, bioengineer, surgeon, psychiatrist, or pharmaceutical director. Dialogue in rank was pleasing and substantive; life experience coupled through extensive work experience has shaped complex points of view and strong opinions. Such is a particular confer a favor on of an executive program.

After two weeks back at home, we returned in late August despite our equally compressed “fall” semester, again two weeks long. It kicked off with one of the highlights of my experience so far—a New York trip. I had the opportunity to spend an afternoon in New York at the Clinton Foundation in Harlem, followed by a celebration with the entire SOM class of 2010 on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. It was a perfect ending to my capital month of business academy and a great way to ring in the fall semester. Having gone through the intensive summer series, the declension semester seemed probable nothing short of pure enjoyment.

Now my craft education is well underway. It’s hard to believe otherwise than that I have already completed more than 10% of my MBA. I’ve moved on to new classes covering finance, statistics, and transaction; my schedule of classes and luncheons through visiting scholars and executives is tightly mapped gone out through January. But if my continued with Yale has shown me anything thus far, it is to expect the unexpected, and to ravish in it.

Original text: {news-link}

What do you do if you’ve got a legal or academic problem in your more than? Here’s some advice in favor of B-school applicants

by Alison Damast

Watch original video:

During the height of the fall admissions frenzy, schools admissions consultant Linda Abraham typically gets deluged with questions ranging from everything on in what manner to craft a compelling admissions essay to when one should apply in the turning upon particulars circle of time. This fall, she’s gotten a venturesome of inquiries without interruption a topic that usually comes up infrequently: how to haft any academic or disciplinary malign on your record.

"It’s a question that has come up again and again, and people are really struggling with in what way to handle it," said Abraham, an admissions consultant for Accepted.com. In just the past month, students acquire called her asking her advice on everything from how to deal with a former driving-under-the-influence conviction to a previous expulsion from school, she said.

"Our advice is, everlastingly deal with it forthrightly, succinctly, take responsibility, and move on," Abraham said. "What is more difficult to deal with is of plato discipline, especially if cheating is involved."

The fourth book of the pentateuch; census of the hebrews themselves aren’t huge. Abraham says that she’session gotten about 10 inquiries concerning black marks this year, while in most years it might draw near up formerly. Though its unclear what’session behind aggregate the skittishness, Abraham believes one factor is the publicity surrounding MBA applicants’ use of Scoretop.com, a Web locality that allegedly gave users a look at current questions being used on the GMAT business school entrance exam. More than 80 MBA applicants had their GMAT scores canceled (BusinessWeek.com, 9/9/08) because of their involvement with the station.

Indeed, modern moral breaches, including a 2007 cheating incident (BusinessWeek.com, 5/22/08) ] at Duke’s Fuqua School of Business has increased sensitivity to any hint of literary dishonesty. At the same time, more and more business schools are using background checks to verify the intelligence (BusinessWeek.com, 8/26/08) submitted by dint of. students on their applications. In addition, schools are being greater amount of acuminated than ever before with applicants, oftentimes directly asking them if they have been convicted of a felony or be the subject of been academically disciplined by their undergraduate institution

"There is a captain-general sense of advice in the industry, and I know that every school is hoping applicants are feeling that of the same kind with well," said Carrie Marcinkevage, director of MBA admissions at Pennsylvania State University’s Smeal College of Business.

Yet determining what is appropriate to disclose on your avocation school application can be a difficult matter. For example, does a student need to report a ticket he received for drinking in public back when he was an undergrad? And which about that shortcoming grade a student received in a line of conduct freshman year in college? Obtaining a straight answer from admissions officers on how to handle an uneasy incident in one’s past be possible to be difficult, especially if an applicant is discreet of bringing up the incident with the admissions office before applying. To help clear the situation, we’ve spoken to several admissions officers from schools on every side the country. Here’s their advice.

Original text: {news-link}