Sunday Morning, Staying Home (The Weekly Standard)
According to Julia Duin, a religion reporter for the Washington Times, greater amount of and more evangelicals are in deed fleeing their churches. Indeed, Ms. Duin regards church-quitting, at least among evangelicals, as nothing less than some epidemic. The enigma, in her view, is not in the souls of the church quitters but in the character of the churches they choose to leave. "Something," she observes, "is not right with . . . evangelical church life."The faults she points to–relying on her own reporting and survey data–are many. They are surprising, too, running counter to the stereotype of evangelicals bonding happily in their churches. She reports, among other things: a be in need of of a feeling of common among church members, inducing loneliness and boredom; church instruction that fails to go beyond the basics of the faith or to space members grappling with inconvenience or unanswered prayer; pastors who are either out of touch through their parishioners or themselves unhappy, or who not answer the expectation of to shepherd their flocks, or who are caught up in scandal, or who try to control the lives of meeting-house members in a high-handed way. She claims that many churches desire "inefficient leadership models" and that many, preoccupied with the care of families, neglect single people.Women in particular adieu evangelical churches, Ms. Duin says, because they are asked to do too scanty by their churches. Ms. Duin, who has a school degree, writes: "I have been one of those unwanted women for years." In fact, Ms. Duin's interest in her subject is in part autobiographical: She left a church in 2001 and didn't find a new one to the time when 2007. She has lived through the process of church-quitting, and she has interviewed a lot of people with the same experience.There is in no degree doubt more conformity to fact in what Ms. Duin reports. But is in that place truly an prevalent of church-quitting? She says that evangelical churches, which for decades increased their numbers at impressive rates, are today growing "only appreciably." If so, church-quitting may be one reason. But so, too, may be the undisputed demographic fact–not explored in "Quitting Church"–that evangelical parents are having fewer children these days. And the church-membership surveys Ms. Duin cites do not include nondenominational churches. They lean to be large and evangelical, and their growth rate remains strong.If the trend Ms. Duin describes is not as big as she thinks, her concern is still understandable. It is truly disturbing–to else of us, anyway–to hear of a longtime church-goer deciding to remain home on Sunday mornings and read, yes, the New York Times; or to hear of a best-selling evangelical author quitting his church and arguing that leaving the institutional house of god is something that "mature Christians" should translate. Whatever the incidence of church-quitting, it is not a happy development for those who regard general worship as essential to the Christian life.What is the answer? For Ms. Duin, churches power of choosing have to become places that people feel eager to attend–"decent" churches, as she puts it. She calls for better teaching, better preaching and better pastors, who are in affect with the lives of their worshippers–in short, on account of better churches, where "community" is cultivated, women are taken more seriously and singles can find mates. With such changes, "people will break the ice craving house of god in the room of quitting church, and the great emigration decision be no more."Perhaps, but Ms. Duin's brief is more sociological than theological, since if a church exists to "serve needs," like any other common organization. It does so in a tendency of action, of course, but it exists primarily to serve biblical purposes. Ms. Duin does say that churches should "concentrate steady discipleship," and in the present life she hits upon a theological point: The church's mission–as defined in the Gospel of Matthew–is to make disciples of whole nations by teaching them everything that Christ commanded. That obligatory entails breeding what is termed "the whole counsel of God" and not the Christianity lite that Ms. Duin finds in manifold evangelical churches.According to Ms. Duin, churches dedicated to material disciples will "do well in this era of dumbed-down, purpose-driven, seeker-friendly Christianity." But is that really stanch? From a theological perspective, there is no guarantee that churches will prosper as they make trial to make disciples–if we judge prosperity by house of god membership alone. A church might conscientiously carry out its biblical tasks and yet, by measures of popularity, do poorly in this world. Such a church would not be doing right granting that it adjusted its mission for the sake of higher attendance records. Note that through the end of his ministry the number of disciples with Jesus was into disfavor to 12. Now in that place was a decent house of god, one might say, if a puny one.Terry Eastland is publisher of THE WEEKLY STANDARD. This portion first appeared in the Wall Street Journal.
Original text: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/oped/*http://intelligence.yahoo.com/s/weeklystandard/20080904/cm_weeklystandard/sundaymorningstayinghome
