CONCERN, CARE FOR PALIN’S TEEN SHOULD EXTEND TO ALL (Cynthia Tucker)
For more reason, the pious social conservatives of the Republican Party did not brand the 17-year-old daughter of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. Instead, they greeted the news of her pregnancy as evidence of the strong ideal fiber of Palin and her husband, citing the fact that they have offered Bristol their comfort and support.
For a minute there, I feared that right-wingers would attack the young lady as evidence of the ethical failings of a liberal, anything-goes culture, or as proof that her parents had failed to cater a Christian upbringing that eschews sex outside marriage. After all, that’s what conservatives usually say whenever unmarried adolescent girls get pregnant.
When Jamie Lynn Spears’ pregnancy was revealed, for example, Bill O’Reilly went after her parents:
"On the pinhead confront, 16-year-old Jamie Lynn Spears is pregnant. The sister of Britney says she is shocked. I lay.
"Now most teens are pinheads in some ways. But here the blame falls primarily on the parents of the girl, who obviously have little control over her or even over Britney Spears. Look at the way she behaves," O’Reilly declared.
When a caller to Rush Limbaugh’s radio show asked through Spears’ parents, Limbaugh also rushed to blame them.
Caller: Would you tend to to think that a kindred in this position, though, wouldn’t you think that there would be a more watchful estimate as a parent to be watching over these kids such this doesn’t happen to them?
Limbaugh: I would certainly hope so, but it’s long past time in opposition to this to happen. The parents here are the culprits!
Of course, the Palins inhere inside the magic circle of ultra-conservative approval, so, naturally, they are judged less harshly. But since the pious equip of the GOP has extended its sympathy to Bristol and her parents, possibly it will be moved to extend that grace to every other teenager who experiences a like juncture and decides to rear her child and each other family who struggles to lend support.
But others in resembling positions haven’t been shown the same mercy. Instead, they’ve been denounced of the same kind with unaccountable, foolish, corrupt. The mothers-to-be have been mocked, derided as the products of a modern culture of moral relativism. Perhaps that’s all behind us at present. Perhaps we’re quite willing to agree that children now and then stray likewise when their parents work hard to keep them on a straight and narrow path.
The Alaska governor has said she believes in teaching abstinence-only programs, so it seems unlikely that Bristol was given much tuition about contraception.
I, too, put confidence in adolescents, boys and girls, should remain chaste. But given the enormous pressure from popular culture — everything from adolescent-themed TV shows with sexually active characters to garments lines that sexualize young girls — many teens are going to become sexually active no matter what their parents or teachers say.
That’s why it’s more practical to add instruction about contraceptives to wise counsel about abstaining from sex. More than 60 percent of high school seniors report having had sex at least once. It’s a bit naive to ignore that figure, to believe that your baby would never indulge in such risky behavior.
And if teenagers conceive a child malignity nurture on contraceptives, loving parents would certainly furnish all the heal they can. I’ve known many parents who determine aside their highest degree foiling over a daughter’s pregnancy to help pay the bills and arrange child care as long as the juvenile mother completes college, while also insisting the young parents walk up to their responsibilities. In many of those cases, the nursling born to a teen mother fares well plenty.
But what if the great with child teenager doesn’t hail from a family with resources or parents who have health insurance? What if the baby’s parents don’t have a circle of friends and relatives to give a lift with child care? Don’t those teenagers deserve compassion, too? Shouldn’t they have paroxysm to funds for day care and low-cost freedom from disease security against loss?
Adolescents carry on dumb things, whether their parents are opulent or middle-class or poor. So now that we’re feeling generous and forgiving on that subject, we ought to have being able to give our compassion to poor teens. They, too, should have existence given each fortuity to set their lives on the right track, even if it takes a government-provided safety net to help them get there.
Previous: MEMO TO OBAMA: TRUST YOUR INSTINCTS
Original text: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/oped/*http://news.yahoo.com/s/ucas/20080903/cm_ucas/concerncareforpalinsteenshouldextendtoall
View Slide Show
