Watch original video:

The West's response to this assault has so more distant been anemic. American rhetoric about Russia's actions has been strong but has not deterred Putin from pushing even harder. France's president, Nicholas Sarkozy, went from Moscow to Tbilisi by a Russian final condition in his hand disguised as a compromise armistice. Georgia's president, Mikhail Saakashvili, signed it during the time that parts of his country were occupied through Russian troops and Russian military aircraft circled aloft. If Sarkozy believes that he has brought peace in our time, he's in for a foiling. The countries that responded principally courageously are those most vulnerable to the imperialistic precedent Putin is attempting to establish–the Baltic States, Ukraine, Poland, and Azerbaijan. The choice before the West it being so that is very clear: We either help those states–and Georgia–protect themselves, or we serve as midwife to a reborn Russian Empire and an between nations order that is red in tooth and laniate.Saakashvili's decision to send troops into South Ossetia was not an unprovoked act of aggression that somehow justifies Moscow's response. Since Kosovo's declaration of independence in February–an event that the Russians, high-flavored allies of Serbia, violently opposed–Putin has undeviatingly escalated tensions between Georgia and its two breakaway enclaves, South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Russian aircraft require downed Georgian unmanned aerial vehicles extremely Abkhazia. Russia nearly doubled the tell off of "peacekeepers" in that territory for no very good understanding. South Ossetian forces have shelled and raided Georgian areas. Tbilisi's response to these provocations was generally assailant in style but added mild in exercise. It is not entirely not to be mistaken why Saakashvili decided on August 7 to respond more directly to the most recent provocations, but he acted exclusively on his own territory (South Ossetia is appease legally character of Georgia) and in defense of his own citizens for that which is less than set upon. In the step, Georgian troops fought Russian peacekeepers in Tskhinvali, the prime of South Ossetia. If Moscow had restricted itself to protecting its peacekeepers, even perhaps to the expanse of sending temporary reinforcements to make sure their close custody, the conflict and its consequences would still have remained limited. But Putin did no in the same state thing. Through President Dmitri Medvedev, whose status as a figurehead was confirmed in this acme, Putin ordered an armored unit in nearby Vladikavkaz to secure Tskhinvali and sent in airborne reinforcements from as far away at the same time that St. Petersburg. He also expanded the interfere from South Ossetia to Abkhazia, where the Georgians had taken no action that could conceivably be construed as inciting. Abkhazian forces, with Russian assistance, herd Georgian troops loudly of Abkhazia. Putin sent more than 6,000 additional Russian troops into Abkhazia in violation of Russia's international engagements in the area. Russia's Black Sea fleet moved to the Abkhazian coast and began searching vessels and setting adhering fire on Georgian boats. And Russian body of soldiers aircraft began an extensive bombing campaign that targeted the bases of every alone combat unit in the Georgian army, as well as command-and-control nodes, radar installations, and other Georgian infrastructure. All of these actions stand in flagrant transgression of Russian agreements with Georgia, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, and the United Nations.The Russian excuses for these actions offence the intelligence. Medvedev justified the invasion by announcing Moscow's obligation to protect "the dignity and lives of Russian citizens" whether on Russian blot or not (Moscow had given out thousands of Russian passports to South Ossetians making them "Russian citizens"). The Russian equivalent of our attorney general, prompted by Medvedev, proclaimed that Russian law allows "adventitious citizens and individuals without citizenship, not currently living in the Russian Federation, who have committed crimes outside the boundaries of the Russian Federation, to have criminal actions brought against them in the event that the crimes are directed against the interests of the Russian Federation." Following on this, the Russian political and judicial leadership made clear that it is building a legal case against Saakashvili and other Georgian officials to be tried in Russian courts under Russian law–in adding to charges of "genocide" Russia intends to make against Saakashvili in international tribunals. The Russian military has also asserted that it can insist upon the disarmament of foreign military forces stationed on their own besmear that have not attacked or threatened to attack Russia if, in the individual opinion of the Russian military leadership, those forces pose a menace to Russian troops–and that it can attack and forcibly disarm those troops admitting that they do not comply.Thus we see Putin's playbook for the restoration of the Russian Empire. Every former Soviet Republic has a significant population of Russians–in some states more than half the population is ethnically Russian. Moscow has now asserted that it can use military troop to defend not only the lives but the "greatness" of those "citizens." It has asserted that Russian Federation law applies not only to those citizens, but to the non-Russian leaders in whose countries they live. And it has asserted that it be able to use body of soldiers press preemptively on foreign soil if it sees a threat to its forces or to its "citizens." If these assertions are allowed to stand, the competence of the former Soviet republics is effectively at an end.That is why the Estonian house of lords and house of commons met in extraordinary session utmost weekend to ask that NATO occur expedited membership to Georgia. It is why the three Baltic presidents and the president of Poland condemned Russia's actions. It is why Azerbaijan, immediately after the Russian incursion, declared that Saakashvili's initial actions had been legally justified. It is why Ukraine threatened to prevent the Black Sea armada from returning to its leased port facilities in Sevastopol if it participated in military operations against Georgia (that it did–and the flotilla has since moved to the Russian port of Novorossiisk). These forthright declarations and actions have exposed all of these countries–including four NATO allies–to Russia's wrath, which Moscow has been quick to discover. Russian media responded to Ukraine's announcement with denunciations of Ukrainian military support to Georgia–tensions between Moscow and Kiev right now are extremely high. The West mouldiness defend Saakashvili and Georgia and help these other courageous young democracies defend themselves against Russian retribution. Hitherto, American military assistance has focused on helping our allies help us. We have frowned on efforts by Russia's neighbors to build large reserve forces that could resist a Russian invasion, to buy advanced air defense systems that could protect threatened airspace, or to develop anti-tank capabilities needed to halt Russian armored columns. That is why, for all the military assistance we've given Georgia over the years, the Georgian military crumbled in the face of a limited Russian attack.In addition to the many good ideas for responding to Russia's aggression that have been proposed elsewhere–expanding NATO, stalling WTO negotiations, kicking Russia out of the G-8–Washington should offer a revamped military assistance program to our NATO allies in Eastern Europe, as well as to Ukraine and Georgia. This program should aim to turn eddish. of those states into a daunting porcupine capable of deterring the Russian bear. We should drop our resistance to the creation of broad fitted reserves in those countries alongside the shallow professional militaries we are already helping to create. And we should extend our military advisory presence so that we can help threatened states have the capability to respond to unforeseen Russian attack by denying Russian aircraft control of the skies and Russian tanks free entry into their province.All of these actions are defensive. We need not give Russia's neighbors advanced tanks, inflict aircraft, or long-range precision weapons. NATO should extend a guarantee to Georgia and Ukraine, but this program could help withhold Russian aggression even without like a guarantee. The aims of this effort are very different from our Cold War generalship. We would not have existence trying to contain Russia in the prospect that it would ultimately collapse of its own contradictions. We would simply be trying to assist independent, potentate states to protect themselves, and thereby helping persuade Russia to promise the cosmos like a single one other responsible member of the between nations community, something that the Russians–in contrast to the Soviets–constantly claim that they are endeavoring to do.In its allow regard and in the interests of its allies, America must reject Vladimir Putin's attempts to rewrite international law to suit Russia's revanchist ambitions. We be required to throw aside the Russian fairy rehearsal that aid to Russia's neighbors is a menace to Russia. And we must reject the idea that helping Russia's neighbors stand up to Moscow resolution cause a new Cold War that appeasement would somehow avoid.–Frederick W. Kagan, for the Editors


Original text: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/oped/*http://news.yahoo.com/s/weeklystandard/20080819/cm_weeklystandard/whatistobedone