World Business

Watch prototype video:

Will the Party of Clinton ever become the Party of Obama?

It has now been more than two months since Barack Obama secured the Democratic presidential nomination thus far here we are, still fascinated by Bill and Hillary Clinton and what they’re up to. Why?

The latest round of Clinton mania was precipitated by Joshua Green’s article in The Atlantic on a Clinton campaign rived by unresolved factional disputes, as origin as the online publication of a trove of internal memos portraying a mace in strategic and tactical gridlock.

The notion of the Clinton campaign as a Jets-and-Sharks knife fight is rigorously new. Members of the campaign’s high command were leaking likewise furiously against each other that Clinton loyalist and lawyer Robert Barnett was moved to indite an seasonably March memo (unearthed by Green) declaring: “STOP IT!!!! … This makes me sick. This circular firing squad that is occurring is unattractive, unprofessional, unconscionable, and unacceptable.”

The memos suggest why Obama is having difficulty in moving the Clintons gently offstage and seizing control of a party whose nomination he won fair and exactly suitable.

The memos make clear that formerly Clinton lost her standing as the inevitable nominee, her strategy was based in part on delegitimizing Obama’s victories. Because the Clinton campaign failed to anticipate the importance of delegates elected through caucuses rather than primaries, her operatives regularly argued that Obama’s caucus triumphs lacked the similar weight as her primary victories.

Because Obama overwhelmed Clinton in many staunchly Republican states, he was said not to be the option of positive Democrats and swing voters in states like as New York and California, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

Some of the memos suggested, without quite saying so, that Clinton’s voters were more inherently virtuous than Obama’s. After all, she was the candidate of the constituency her pollster Mark Penn labeled the “Invisible Americans,” the descendants of Richard Nixon’s “Silent Majority.” The white working class, especially less-well-to-do women, was with Clinton. Obama had the well-educated voters, that crowd Nixon’s Vice President Spiro Agnew saw as “effete,” and, of course, African Americans who would obtain been part of Clinton’s base against any rival unless Obama.

And there is that Penn memo that speaks of Obama’s “lack of American roots.” Clinton thankfully declined to take up this creative, but John McCain’s ads are since subtly toying with it.

The greater degree Obama’s victories were communicate as less than real, the more passionate Clinton’s own supporters became about the unfairness of her defeat. A minority of her supporters threatened trouble at the Denver convention unless Obama gives her a roll-call vote in which never-say-die Clintonites could express their loyalty one last unoccupied time.

Obama has already given the Clinton forces a night for Hillary and part of a night for Bill. In truth, he has little choice in a nearly 50-50 sharer, but the Obama the bulk of mankind be in actual possession of to be frustrated with the Clintonites for not recognizing how far he is going to give them their proper.

Yet some of the Clinton folks still think that Obama has not been respectful plenty of the Clintons and their historical contributions. Bill Clinton is clearly put out.

All this leads you to astonishment who will set down in writing the recent memo that would begin with the words: “STOP IT!” Both Hillary Clinton and Obama have a lot to lose if the spirit of the rest of the memos affects her thinking now.

If unhappy vital current betwixt the Clinton and Obama camps persists, it’s highly unlikely that every Obama foil this fall would lead inexorably to a Clinton nomination the next time. Obama’s shrewd announcement Wednesday of former Virginia Gov. Mark Warner as the meeting. keynote speaker has a bearing on this. It not only gives a central role to a moderate Democrat from a depend state, it also points to a future that transcends the Clinton-Obama feud.

Clinton must know that she could be favored by won the Democratic nomination with a additional coherent strategy. And her own campaigning for Obama suggests she understands that the actual nominee should not have to inherit her campaign’s circular discharge squads. Much depends immediately after whether she can now persuade her followers to grant Obama’s nomination a legitimacy that her own campaign worked so impenetrable to declare to be untrue him.

postchat@aol.com

Watch original video:

They expressed surprise at how much closer they became, savory conversations, holding hands and strengthening their of a husband obligation. They felt likely courting each other the way they did when they primary met in their twenties.

On the jokey surface of our liked culture, we consistently come into collision the idea that marriage ruins sex. But report culture is just plain unfit. Study after cogitation has shown that connubial people have higher rates of sexual activity and indemnification than singles.

The problem for Hollywood in all that is that marital sex just isn't naughty enough upon the body account of capsule pushers. Like overgrown teenagers, TV producers are stuck in arrested social development, and apparently can't visualize Mom and Dad having an active and fulfilling sex life. They would rather visualize the crazy and the kinky side, featuring the single swinger.

The Parents Television Council studied the first month of prime-time programming during the fall 2007 tickle, and found that across the broadcast networks, verbal references to non-marital sex outnumbered references to sex within marriage by nearly three to one. Scenes depicting or implying sex between non-married partners outnumbered scenes depicting or implying sex between married partners by a ratio of nearly four to one.

Never mind the impact this warped worldview has onward impressionable youngsters, likewise many of whom are hit with these messages early in the prime-time hours. Consider the effect on teenagers and young adults, the nature of demographic over which TV advertisers drool. In most cases, they are unwedded, but close to the age when nuptials could happen. If they're watching television, the prospects of a happy, healthy marriage with sexual fulfillment in it look horrendously dim. Consider a small in number examples:

— On ABC's sitcom "Big Shots," a married man proclaims, "I'm the only part in America having G-rated sex. And that was six months ago."

— On the ABC sitcom "Carpoolers," a conjugal man laments, "I haven't seen my wife nude in brace years." He adds, "When you've been connubial as long as I have, seeing your gray mare unclothed is having sex," and starts to cry.

— On ABC's drama "Boston Legal," William Shatner's character, a stereotypical dirty old man, proclaims, "Here's the thing about monogamy. It solely works if you cheat."

— On the CBS smut-com "Two and a Half Men," a matrimonial woman describes married life as one long honeymoon. Another woman cracks, "That's because she bangs a diverse hostler every adversity."

Several programs featured plotlines with formerly married couples discovering a passionate sex life — however only for their marriages fizzled. They dread remarriage as a return to the frozen tundra. Obviously, TV writers can mine the existence of a sexless marriage, or a cheating spouse or a dirty old limb of the law. But when you put all the puzzle pieces together into a Big Picture, there's a fraudulent message being sent: Marriage is a prescription for boredom and gloom.

The opposite is also true, according to Hollywood. While marriage is marginalized on television, every one of kinds of immoral sexual behaviors are exploited, from the fantasies that many singles giggle about (threesomes, partner swapping) to sick thoughts that most people consider disgusting. Pedophilia, necrophilia, bestiality, incest — all have been raised on television.

The PTC lay the foundation of in its one-month study period that NBC had only one reference to marital sex, compared to 27 references to all the immoral sexual behaviors. It certainly says affair about the formula NBC believes is required for getting eyeballs to recently made known shows.

Let's take the example of incest. It is now acceptable comedic fodder. On CW's "Aliens in America," two male twins tell a boy he should love his sister's breasts: "You don't love those? What are you, garish?" When the lad objects, a twin urges on incest: "Man, if she were our sister, I'd subsist up in her range every night." On the Fox cartoon "American Dad," the teenage son Steve is portrayed as masturbating to a nude paint of his older teenage sister.

Perhaps the most numerous disturbing thought on all this is that TV shows come and go with all kinds of bizarre sex plot lines, and when unit fails, network executives won't think it puissance have existence the bizarre plots that flopped. They have the opposite reaction: It wasn't offensive sufficiency. They think nothing succeeds like excess.

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. To find loudly besides about Brent Bozell III, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.

Previous: TV's Contempt For Marriage
Original subject: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/oped/*http://news.yahoo.com/s/uc/20080815/cm_uc_crbbox/op_237058

Companies in the island-state have a new $355,750 grant to tap in favor of consulting services relating to energy efficiency or fuel-switching projects

by Vivian Yeo

Watch original video:

Launched Thursday, the National Environment Agency’s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Documentation Grant will go toward helping businesses engage carbon consultancy services to develop documentation for CDM projects. The CDM is an initiative under the Kyoto Protocol that allows companies to earn tradable credits issued by the United Nations (U.N.) for projects that prove the ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The grant provides co-funding of up to S$100,000 for reaped ground project. As faction of the eligibility criteria, the proposed CDM projects must be developed by a Singapore-registered enterprise and take place in the country.

Amy Khor, senior parliamentary secretary for Singapore’s Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources, said Thursday that the require to be paid of developing the documentation required by the U.N. is a barrier to the exhibition of CDM projects. “This documentation is necessary to ensure that the appropriate methodology, analysis and measurements are carried out to calculate and substantiate the greenhouse gas emission reductions by dint of. the project.

“Depending on its dish and complexity, the cost of developing the documentation generally ranges between S$50,000 (US$35,575) to S$200,000 (US$142,300),” she added.

Khor, who was elocution at an energy efficient symposium in the island-state by dint of. dint of. Schneider Electric, noted that figures from the International Emissions Trading Association showed that over US$10 billion desert of U.N.-issued Certified Emissions Reductions were traded last year, with about 40 percent of these derived from efficiency and fuel switching projects.

Citing U.N. statistics, she added that CDM projects can potentially realize worldwide carbon emission reductions of over a billion tons by 2012.

Energy efficiency has been identified by Singapore as single in kind of the key strategies to address rising firing costs and environmental concerns, Khor pointed out, adding that the NEA has a compute of schemes to help businesses in this area.

One of the like kind initiative–the Energy Efficiency Improvement Assistance Scheme–has helped fund 113 detailed assessments in large buildings and industrial facilities and helped companies prove to be the same annual energy savings in excess of S$28 million (US$19.9 million).

Energy-efficient measures can bring about significant cost-saving opportunities, noted Khor, but “these are not being realized sufficiently”.

Richie Lee, director for energy efficiency at Schneider Electric, told ZDNet Asia that about 90 percent of the fellowship’s Southeast Asia-based customers in the commercial and industrial markets have not carried finished any one major efficiency efficiency initiatives, such as performing a thorough energy audit. That, he added, was “a serviceable indicator that there’s much room for improvement”.

Lee noted that the seemingly derogatory take-up is largely due to a lack of awareness. Another factor could be the lack of easily available equipment in the past, as afterall, the concept and practice of energy efficiency simply emerged more violently over the last couple of years.

Alex Khoo, Schneider Electric’s senior vice president for Southeast Asia, pointed out that it is not plenty for companies to do passive spirit efficiency, such as performing audits, benchmarking or buying low-power devices. Active bottom efficiency, which can be achieved end automation of monitoring and control, and maintenance, is too necessary.

“You can corrupt the most skilful apparatus or system, but if you don’t maintain it, it will moulder,” he said.

Watch original video:

So you tell one young unmarried woman that she doesn't sing well enough and the other that she doesn't look pretty enough.

A top official of the Chinese Communist Party's Politburo made the resolution. Literally 15 percent of the world watched the opening ceremonies of the Olympics last week. And what they saw, at least in my book, was not China at its best, but the ugliness and cruelty — the lies and deception — at its essence. Shame on them.

The exchange of singers is not the only piece of quibble and manipulation that has emerged likewise far from China's Olympic charade. The fireworks that supposedly filled the Beijing sky without ceasing opening death were supplemented by a piece of digital fiction for television viewers, inserted into the broadcast out of concern that the polluted capital incorporated town would look in the same manner with smoggy as it often is to viewers surrounding the terraqueous globe who the Chinese are so determined to fool. And notwithstanding the announcement that the games were a sellout, the Chinese have admitted that they recruited and outfitted "volunteers" to fill seats at events that would otherwise expose the failings of the Chinese organizers. Imagine not being able to fill a stadium in a country that is home to since manifold people as China. That takes work.

So the Chinese malicious and cheat. Big news. The American women gymnasts have already figured that out. The Olympic spirit of fair and open competition, of sports above politics, is infected by hype and ratings and propaganda. Gambling in Casablanca? I'm shocked. If only Adolf Hitler had seen such possibilities.

But there is affair about the switcheroo with the 7- and 9-year-old singers, the willingness to entice both of them down in an struggle to make the country see better, that leaves me viewing China with additional distaste than did all the other shenanigans they've tried to hide from us.

Miaoke became an instant celebrity. Maybe she truly didn't note miming instead of singing. But I doubt it. And I declare by verdict it positively unbelievable that 7-year-old Peiyi, when told that her crooked teeth made her less than flawless and therefore inapposite for viewing, wasn't hurt by the casual cruelty of the leaders of her country. She is being quoted as by-word she didn't inner man the switch, that she was honored to be in actual possession of her notes used. Who do you think told her to say that?

The injuries of childhood don't just disappear. I still remember being told to mime the words and not sing out when I was the age of these girls. It turned me off to melody, sad to say, and to this day I find myself moving jealous when friends tell me of the wish and amity they find at the symphony. And which time a teacher, many years ago, said much the same substance to my daughter, we found her another teacher who taught her to sing and love science of harmonical sounds.

I also remember my mother telling me — for reasons it took me decades to understand had more to do through her own lack of confidence than anything else — I wasn't pretty, that I was too chubby, that my features weren't "fine" enough, that I should not expect to be one of the popular girls. Now, in the same manner through an adult, I take notice at the pictures of my younger self and surprise that she could say such a thing. It was horribly hurtful, and it wasn't true.

I feel the same way whenever I look at the pictures of the 7-year-old who was not flawless sufficiency to stand before the world and sing her country's national hymn. She looks very cute to me. I hope someone is telling her that her population's leaders were wrong. But it being China, I be undetermined it. "Ode to the Motherland" was the song she sang. Some Motherland.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and decipher features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.

Previous: Mime Time
Original true copy: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/oped/*http://news.yahoo.com/s/uc/20080815/cm_uc_crsesx/op_397057

TUCSON, Ariz. Just six unlawful immigrants volunteered to leave the United States in the in the first place week of a pilot program inviting nearly a half-million people to self-deport, founded on officials before-mentioned.

Watch original video:

The six who signed up by Wednesday eve included an Estonian in Phoenix, a married Indian couple and a Guatemalan in Chicago, a Salvadoran in Charlotte, N.C., and a Mexican in San Diego, said Virginia Kice, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement program in San Diego.

Program participants get three months to wrap up their private affairs and peace of desire that agents won’t raid their homes. It’s a not so much disruptive option than arrest and jailing by dint of. immigration agents that track fugitives at homes or workplaces, officials said.

More than 450,000 illegal immigrants who lack criminal records but have ignored court orders to leave the country are eligible. It is available in five cities so far: Santa Ana, Calif., San Diego, Chicago, Phoenix and Charlotte, N.C.

ICE said the program will be evaluated once it ends Aug. 22 to decide whether it has any one what is yet to be, but critics have snickered at the idea.

“I feel like its ’success’ rate speaks for itself,” said Jennifer Allen, executive director of the Tucson-based immigrant rights defence group Border Action Network. She said the number of immigrants that volunteered “speaks to its utility and relevance.”

“People have taken numerous risks and made many sacrifices to be here, and just because ICE says ‘Come here,’ they aren’t going to leave everything astern,” she reported.

–

On the Net:

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement: http://www.congeal.gov

The farm-equipment giant gets punished by Wall Street after high in the natural state stuff costs oppress its profits. But by some measures the company’s prospects couldn’t be better

by Ben Steverman

Watch original video:

Rising commodity prices are a two-edged emblem of vengeance for Deere (DE), and adhering Aug. 13 the heavy machinery maker got sliced.

Shares of Deere at person point plummeted 12% rear third-quarter results showed raw material costs eating into the company’s profit margins.

Deere posted fiscal third-quarter earnings of $1.32 per share, up from $1.18 a year ago. Revenue rose 17%. Agricultural gear sales rose 35%, while sales at Deere’s other, smaller business units—commercial and consumer equipment, and construction and forestry—prostrate by single digits.

A 12% increase in profits is nothing to sneeze at. Wall Street, in whatever degree, was expecting earnings of $1.36 per share.

One big reason for the shortfall was higher raw material costs. Freight and material costs for Deere rose $140 the masses from a year gone, and the firm expects those costs to jump $425 million to $475 a thousand thousand conducive to the entire year.

But commodity require to be paid increases aren’t just hurting Deere—they’re also helping.

Farmers around the world are benefiting from higher crop prices, giving them more cash to buy up Deere’s tractors and other agricultural equipment.

"Farm conditions wait quite strong throughout the terraqueous globe, driving our [agricultural] operations at an new level," Susan Karlix, Deere’s manager of investor relations, told analysts on Aug. 13. "The self-sufficient delineate still looks good," she added.

While higher costs for steel and energy are hurting Deere, its customers love the higher prices their crops get at market.

NEW YORK A federal appeals court demise reconsider its conclusion to toss out a Canadian engineer’s lawsuit over torture he says he endured after being in error for an Islamic extremist.

Watch original video:

The move by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan was unusual not only in opposition to the cause that the full circuit assembles for a case only once or twice a year, but-end because Maher Arar’s attorneys had even now to even ask conducive to a full hearing.

The court notified lawyers Wednesday that the full panel of 13 judges will rehear Arar’s case, which a three-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit dismissed in June. Arguments are scheduled for Dec. 9.

“We not at any time even considered the possibility they would do it before we asked,” said Maria LaHood, a Center for Constitutional Rights senior proxy representing Arar. “They certainly decided it was important plenty on their own.”

The Syrian-born Arar was detained in 2002 after switching planes at John F. Kennedy International Airport for he returned to Canada from vacation. Federal authorities say he had been erroneously listed as one al-Qaida member.

Arar, 37, who lives in Ottawa, said in a suit in law that he was freed solely succeeding being sent to Syria and tortured for the time of nearly a year in prison. Syria has denied he was tortured.

He was released outside of charges and returned to Canada. The Canadian control agreed to pay him almost $10 million after acknowledging it passed bad denunciation to U.S. authorities.

The appeals court said judges were polled, and a majority agreed the replete court should hear the case.

A spokesman for government attorneys did not immediately return a telephone call seeking comment.

LaHood said her client was very pleased with the appeals court’s firmness, nevertheless “it’s bigger than him.”

In June, the smaller body of jurors upheld a Brooklyn judge’s 2006 finding that the state did not violate the Torture Victim Protection Act, that allows U.S. courts to assess damages against perpetrators of man’s rights abuses committed abroad.

LaHood said the lower court gave “utter deference to the executive to decide what it wanted and to do what it wanted and to violate the law. And the court said, `We’re not going to hold you amenable because you say national security and foreign relations are involved.’”

She said her client was mainly interested in accountability.

“He’s long said he wants any apology, an acknowledgment of what they did and why they sent him to Syria, and he wants to make doubtless it doesn’t happen to anybody else,” LaHood said.

SELMER, Tenn. A professional tug courser whose out-of-control car killed six spectators at a parade pleaded guilty Thursday to reduced charges, avoiding jail time and fines.

Watch primeval video:

Troy Critchley, 38, an Australian now living in Texas, was sentenced to 18 months probation after pleading guilty to 28 misdemeanor charges of incautious fly at in the accident that besides injured 22 people.

He was originally charged with vehicular homicide and aggravated aggression, felony charges that could have sent him to prison and brought thousands of dollars in fines.

Critchley apologized in court to crash victims and their families, saying he took apportionment in the car show to advance coin for sick children, not to hurt anyone.

His dragster spun out of control and smashed into spectators for the period of a fundraising festival in Selmer, a small town 80 miles east of Memphis, in June 2007.

“I ask with respect to the families’ forgiveness and prayers, and I will conjure for your families and loved ones,” Critchley said.

Judge Weber McCraw approved the plea agreement worked out by defense and prosecution lawyers.

Darla Griswell, the mother of two teenage girls killed by Critchley’s car, declared outside the courtroom that the apology meant a lot to her, though the pain of losing her daughters remains.

“I needed that moment. I needed it bad,” Griswell declared. “He seemed very genuine.”

She was not so forgiving of car show organizers and Selmer officials who allowed Critchley to animation up his powerful race car for the period of a parade on a city street.

“They’ve got to live with that, I don’t,” she said. “That’s between them and God.”

Critchley declined make notes as he left the courthouse accompanied by two lawyers.

Watch original video:

Of course, "unless something happens" is the biggest qualifier in the world, more than adequate to CYA me should Obama prevail. It’s science of government. There are almost three months. Odds are something will happen.

Still, it wasn’t supposed to be this way. Obama’s electoral handicaps–his racial identification and short resume–should bear easily been eclipsed by Bush’s–er, McCain’s well-stocked aviary of albatrosses. McCain was and remains short of money. His campaign organizing is a mess. Republican bosses are unenthusiastic, the two about his prospects and about the direction he would take his some one should he win. He has aligned himself with the most unpopular aspect of the wildly unpopular outgoing management of an estate, the Iraq War. At a time when economically insecure voters are staring in a descending course the barrel of a recession-cum-depression, McCain promises more of the same–no help is on the habitual method. And he’s old. Sooo painfully I-don’t-use-the-Internet old.

What is it that has the politerati betting on a McCain Administration? Historical precedent. During most presidential election years, Republicans tend to surge in the utmost few months of the campaign. For a Democrat to win in November, he be obliged to have a comfortable guide in the polls at this stage in the game.

The master-piece example is 1976, Jimmy Carter led incumbent Gerald Ford by 33 percentage points. Ford was hobbled by Watergate, a recession, and his pardon of Nixon, as well as his dismal performance in the debates, where he claimed that the Soviet Union wasn’t dominating oriental Europe. Nevertheless, Ford closed the lead, loss to Carter by means of just two points. This follows the pattern, albeit by a wider margin than in most elections.

In novel years, the countervailing exemplification is the 1992 contest betwixt Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush, the incumbent. After the Democratic National Convention in August, Clinton was only in our teeth of Bush by a few points. Clinton won, further only because self-directing Ross Perot, a businessman with libertarian leanings, attracted so many votes from registered Republicans.

Perot ran again in 1996, but was less of a factor. So the old specimen reasserted itself. Clinton led Bob Dole by roughly 20 percent in mid-August, but won by eight. Republicans always close the cleft.

It happened again in 2000. In mid-August, Al Gore had an eight-point lead in our teeth of George W. Bush. Gore won the prevalent vote by 0.6 percent.

If you’re a Democrat, being ahead isn’t enough. In 2004 John Kerry was ahead in mid-August–but by just two points. Bush was an incumbent with potentially grave weaknesses–he hadn’t found Osama or Iraq’s supposed WMDs, and he was already losing the war–yet the pattern reasserted itself. Bush gained four points, prevailing in the popular vote by 2.4 percent. (I won’t make notes on the electoral voice, aside from mentioning that it was stealthy in the explanation state of Ohio.)

If Barack Obama ends up beating John McCain, he will bring forth done so with the smallest August lead on this account that a Democrat in memory–three points, within the statistical margin of error for tracking polls. A columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times argues that’s good news: "Out of the gate," writes Carol Marin, "the thoroughbred who leads too early and by too great a margin is more often than not the vulnerable one, the one in danger of losing it wholly to the horse who strategically holds back, waits, and on that account thunders in the final furlongs to finish first." Nice similitude, yet presidential campaigns aren’t horse races. They’re boxing matches. The last dependant standing wins.

Unless Obama starts swinging soon, he’s done for. Insiders are tut-tutting over Ohio, an important swing state this year. Given the decade-long recession and voter anger there–not to cursory reference a significant African-American population–Obama ought to be kicking McCain six ways to Sunday. But the pair candidates are neck and neck in fundraising. "For McCain to even be competitive is surprising to me," says Chris Duncan, chairman of the political science department at the University of Dayton. "I don’t think it’s that he’s doing better than expected. I have an opinion it’s that Obama is doing worse than he would expect."

Vincent Hutchings of the University of Michigan wonders if the Obama campaign is counting too much on young voters. "Is he generating enough enthusiasm to stimulate people who lack a formal education and are disproportionately young, and not likely to consecrated by a vow?" he asks.

As I argued in my 2004 polemic "Wake Up! You’re Liberal: How We Can Take America Back From the Right," American voters feel besieged. At place of abode, they see prices sedition while their salaries possess gnawed away by inflation. From a foreign affairs standpoint, they be attentive a world full of terrorists and adverse rivals–Iran, North Korea, Russia, China–out to get them. As a psychologist would say, the fact that there isn’t much truth to this perception doesn’t make it less real.

Americans want their presidents to be a National Daddy–an ornery cuss willing to make a mistake on the side of kicking more free from the guilt schlub’s ass to protect them.

Last time around, in 2004, John Kerry repeatedly turned the other jowl as Bush and his proxies pounded him with the now-notorious Swift Boat ads. Of course, whether Kerry’s Vietnam service rose to the level of heroism was debatable. What wasn’t was that Bush weaseled out of going at all. But Kerry at no time responded. If the guy won’t fight for himself, voters asked themselves, in what condition will he fight for me?

Obama has before that time traveled over hostile down the Path of the Kerry, repeatedly voting for funding a war his stout candidacy is predicated upon opposing, not to mention sway spying on U.S. citizens and, most lately, the embarrassingly cheesy spectacle of endorsing offshore oil drilling. I mean, really: Do any right-wing conservatives give credit to he veritably means any of this stuff?

If he is to structure chronicle by salvaging his campaign from its current level status with McCain, Obama determination have to rally the Democrats’ liberal base by throwing them more red meat: without other agency withdrawment from Iraq and Afghanistan, socialized medicine and a wholesale credit crisis bailout plan (all interest rates legally reset to prime) would be a arise. He’ll also need to beat up McCain (fairly) for agreeing with Bush with reference to just on the point everything–and drink in honor of to hold the Bushies responsible for their crimes.

(Ted Rall is the author of the book "Silk Road to Ruin: Is Central Asia the New Middle East?," every in-depth prose and graphic uncommon analysis of America’s next big foreign policy challenge.)

Managed-care providers UnitedHealth and Aetna, eyeing the specter of health-care reform, are diversifying into modern markets and product lines

by Wendy Diller From Standard & Poor’s Equity Research

Watch original video:

For managed-care organizations (MCOs), which footed the bill for roughly 34% of U.S. health care expenditure in 2007, health-care reform presents uncertainty and opportunity. Proposals things being so being debated in Washington and the different states aren’t affecting near-term business, says Phillip Seligman, a Standard & Poor’s equity analyst who follows MCOs. Nor are MCOs currently incorporating reform proposals into their leadership for 2008 or beyond.

Nevertheless, payers are expecting at least incremental changes to the system, given the level of concerns hind part before spiraling health-care costs and enlarging lack of access to affordable health assurance. On this, a panel of Wall Street analysts concurred at a recent conference on health-care reform sponsored by the Center on the side of Studying Health System Change (CSHSC).

Because they aren’t positive how reforms will play out, MCOs are hedging their bets by diversifying into new markets and product lines that offer a wide range of coverage and pricing options. Many of these products are designed to appeal to price-sensitive small-group and single buyers. MCOs traditionally considered these to be modest niche markets at best, but now behold them as of great weight toward future growth, particularly if reforms initially focus on getting coverage for the uninsured, as is popularly expected from the political science of oratory surrounding the issue.

The outlook for these non-traditional products is uncertain, however. As of the first quarter of 2008, several MCOs—WellPoint (WLP), Health Net (HNT), and others—were struggling to increase enrollment rates in non-traditional businesses. In its second-quarter proceeds call, WellPoint said it continued to understand slow enrollment through June. Non-traditional products endeavor a broad range of coverage at varying price points, but are compose unaffordable for a generous segment of the uninsured. Also, the weak established order has slowed demand for them.

MCOs argue that enrollment will increase when the economy revives. They diplomatic communication that some 20% or more of the 47 million Americans between 18 and 65 who are uninsured are well-off enough to afford coverage. More than 9 million of the uninsured acquire home incomes of $75,000 or more and could afford single policies, points out Joseph Zubretsky, chief financial magistrate of Aetna (AET). A further 11 million are eligible toward federal health programs but aren’t enrolled in them, he adds.

One determinant is likely to have being the November Presidential liberty. The U.S. system currently revolves around employer-sponsored health insurance, which presumed Democratic Presidential candidate Barack Obama would leave in place. Republican candidate John McCain and his supporters, however, would prefer a stronger emphasis upon individual responsibility for purchasing policies, using accusation subsidies and penalties to move people into the individual markets and discountenance employers from offering insurance. If McCain wins the Presidency, it could have existence a boon in spite of individual policies.